1. Both Human Foetuses and Animals are the Most Vulnerable Both pre-born children and animals are living beings that can or potentially can feel pain and joy. Both are degraded as irrational objects or things to which humans can do whatever they fancy. Both are vulnerable and at the mercy of human adults. Human foetuses may be in an even more disadvantaged position than animals because foetuses are trapped in their mother’s womb and have nowhere else to escape to, whereas ani

Someone commented that it is inappropriate for men to tell women what they should do with their own bodies, lives, and souls. They also objected to linking veganism with abortion, even if they themselves are vegan. From their perspective, men should first take responsibility for building a society in which women, children, and families are genuinely protected — emotionally, financially, legally, and socially — before making moral judgements about abortion. Our response is as

Vegans would question antivegans like Charlie Kirk: How can you morally justify unnecessarily causing pain and death to animals? 1. The Weakest Spot of Kirk’s Antivegan Discourse Theologically, the weakest spot of Charlie Kirk’s antivegan discourse is that he is adamant that because only humans are made in the image of God, only human lives matter, and animal lives do not matter. Only humans, including human foetuses, should have rights; animals are entitled to none. But nowh

Every year, at least 73 million innocent human foetuses are aborted/murdered, and 3 trillion innocent animals are murdered, all by humans. In March this yr, in the U.K., the House of Lords backed legislation to decriminalise abortions up to birth, i.e., it will soon be legal for mothers themselves to kill their unborn child at any moment they wish up to full term. Donald Watson, who coined the term "vegan" in 1944, originally defined it as "non-dairy vegetarian". Over time, h