top of page
Search

Tobit was Never Defiled with their Meats. By Dr Chapman Chen

  • Writer: Chapman Chen
    Chapman Chen
  • 12 minutes ago
  • 2 min read

“When all ate of the meats of the Gentiles, he kept his soul and never was defiled with their meats.” (Tobit 1:12 Douay-Rheims Bible)

1. Background of the Book and the Man

The Book of Tobit is one of the apocryphal books of the Bible. It dates to the 3rd or early 2nd century BC. It is a Jewish wisdom narrative set during the Assyrian exile, when Israelites were forcibly relocated to pagan cities after Assyria conquered northern Israel (8th c. BCE). Written for Jews living under foreign domination, the book addresses a pressing question: how can one remain faithful to God when surrounded by a culture that normalises meatism, idolatry, violence, and moral compromise?

The protagonist, Tobit is an ordinary Israelite from the tribe of Naphtali, deported to Nineveh, living among Gentiles, under pressure to assimilate. He is neither priest nor prophet. Precisely for this reason, he is presented as an exemplar of everyday holiness. His righteousness is expressed not through public preaching or political revolt, but through concrete daily practices: almsgiving, burying the dead, prayer — and crucially, refusing animal flesh.

2. “He Kept His Soul”: Food as Moral Boundary

Tobit 1:12 frames diet in unmistakably moral and spiritual terms. The text does not say merely that Tobit avoided ritually unclean food; it says that by refusing “the meats of the Gentiles,” he kept his soul and avoided defilement. Eating is here a spiritual act with ethical consequences.

In Second Temple Judaism, Gentile meat was problematic not only because of species or preparation, but because it was deeply entangled with idol sacrifice, violence against animals, and participation in a pagan worldview.

To eat such food was to participate symbolically in that system. Tobit’s abstention therefore represents a quiet but radical form of resistance. When “all ate,” he refused — not out of superiority, but out of covenantal fidelity.

3. Parallels with Daniel and James the Just

Tobit stands in a clear biblical lineage.

Like Daniel (Daniel 1) the vegan prophet, Tobit refuses the food of empire. Daniel’s rejection of the king’s meat is often read pragmatically, but its logic is the same: holiness is preserved at the table before it is proclaimed in public.

Tobit also anticipates James the Just, whom early Christian sources portray as a vegan ascetic, scrupulous about purity, and deeply concerned with righteousness embodied in daily conduct. All three figures share a common ethic: faithfulness is not abstract belief but disciplined practice, especially regarding food and bodily desire.

4. A Theology of Refusal

Tobit 1:12 offers a vision of holiness grounded in restraint rather than domination. It assumes that what humans consume — particularly when that consumption involves violence — shapes the soul. Salvation, in this view, is not only future or metaphysical; it is cultivated now, through compassion, self-limitation, and refusal to normalise harm.

Tobit does not preach. He abstains from animal flesh. And in that abstention, the text insists, his soul remains whole. #VeganChrist #VeganGod #VeganTheology #VeganChurch

 
 
 

Comments


  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

©2019 by Hong Kong Bilingual News 香江日報. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page