
Summary: The context of Deuteronomy 19:10-13 is the setting up of the cities of refuge, where somebody who accidentally ends the life of another individual can flee for shelter from revenge. But the ethical principle behind – innocent blood – can be extended to cover animals, esp. in the light of other biblical teachings, e.g., “The righteous care for the needs of their animals, but the kindest acts of the wicked are cruel” (Proverb 12:10); “I desire mercy, not sacrifice” (Hosea 6:6); “Whoever kills an ox is like one who kills a person” (Isaiah 66:3); and God’s prescription of a vegan diet (Genesis 1:29-30).
“Thus innocent blood will not be shed in the land that the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, so that you will not be guilty of bloodshed. But if someone hates his neighbor, lies in wait for him, rises up and strikes him fatally, and then flees to one of these cities, the elders of his city must send for him, remove him from the city of refuge, and deliver him into the hand of the avenger of blood to die. You must not show pity. You must purge from Israel the guilt of shedding innocent blood, so that it may go well with you.” (Deuteronomy 19:10-13 BSB)
1. Context: Laws About Innocent Blood and Cities of Refuge
• This passage is part of Deuteronomic law dealing with manslaughter and murder in ancient Israel.
• Verses 1-9 establish the Cities of Refuge, places where someone who by accident kills another person can flee for protection from vengeance.
• Verses 10-13 warn against the deliberate shedding of innocent blood, emphasizing justice and preventing unjustified killing.
• The main focus is human life, particularly avoiding wrongful executions or vigilante justice.
2. Does This Verse Support Veganism and Animal Compassion?
While the immediate context applies to human bloodshed, the ethical principle behind it—protecting the innocent from unjust killing—can be extended to include animals, especially in light of other biblical teachings:
2A. “Innocent Blood” as a Moral Principle
• If innocent human blood should not be shed, should the blood of innocent animals be treated with cruelty?
• The Hebrew Bible frequently extends moral concern to animals, emphasizing mercy, justice, and stewardship.
Proverbs 12:10
“The righteous care for the needs of their animals, but the kindest acts of the wicked are cruel.”
Hosea 6:6
“For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings.”
Implication: The biblical preference for mercy over sacrifice suggests that if the killing of innocent people is condemned, the unnecessary slaughter of animals should also be questioned.
2B. God’s Disapproval of Unjust Bloodshed Includes Animals
Isaiah 66:3
“Whoever kills an ox is like one who kills a person.”
Genesis 1:29-30
“Then God said, ‘Behold, I have given you every seed-bearing plant… They will be yours for food.’”
Implication:
• Isaiah 66:3 equates animal killing with murder, showing that unjustified animal slaughter is condemned.
• Genesis 1:29-30 presents a vegan diet as God’s original ideal, implying that bloodshed—whether human or animal—was never God’s intent.
3. Conclusion: Ethical Consistency in the Bible
✔ Deuteronomy 19:10-13 condemns shedding innocent blood unjustly.
✔ The moral principle of protecting innocent life can be extended to innocent animals.
✔ Other biblical verses criticize unnecessary animal sacrifice and promote mercy.
✔ If God cares about justice for humans, does He not also care about unjust suffering for animals?
Final Thought: While Deuteronomy 19:10-13 primarily applies to human life, its ethical foundation aligns with veganism and compassion toward animals, reflecting God’s broader desire for mercy and justice for all living beings.
Comments